Gideon M-K: Health Nerd

There's No Such Thing As A Vitamin D Deficiency - Part One

The complex science about vitamin D levels and what they mean

Health Nerd's avatar
Health Nerd
Dec 01, 2025
∙ Paid
A person holding a handful of pills in their hand
Pictured: A stock photo that I don’t think I’ve used yet. Photo by Kristīne Kozaka on Unsplash

Vitamin D is everyone’s favourite supplement. It’s the thing that people just know is important. While it’s hard to be sure, with a global market in the billions and a very cheap per-unit cost it’s quite likely that vitamin D is the most taken pill globally. There are just so many people out there who take a daily dose.

Most of this is based on the idea of a deficiency, or the much vaguer concept of insufficiency. We have thresholds for what constitutes “too low” when it comes to many vitamins. For vitamin D, the common wisdom is that this level is set at 20ng/ml, with an additional concern for people with levels between 20-30ng/ml which is usually called insufficiency.

Even Google’s AI agrees, and Google is never wrong.

The problem is, the entire idea of deficiencies are based on very weak evidence. With most conditions, we have a very strict and specific reason to set a threshold, but the basis for calling vitamin D levels of <30ng/ml too low is, and has always been, a bit vague. That’s why in 2024, the US Endocrine Society updated their guidelines and no longer recommends using the term deficiency when it comes to vitamin D levels.

In other words, there’s no such thing as a vitamin D deficiency. Or, at least, the entire idea that we should have a specific amount of vitamin D in our bloodstream is highly contested.

This is a paid-only piece. Please consider signing up to the paid newsletter to support my work!

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Health Nerd.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Health Nerd · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture